Elaine, UK As a smoker, I have no problem going outside for a cigarette. Small workplaces will often ignore the ban and are unlikely to be caught. I hate to eat a good meal without a brandy and a cigarette to finish.
Inside the pub, they had a smoke machine to create the "atmosphere" they had lost from the real smoke. Why is the act of smoking tobacco, which merely injures oneself, so scrutinized and shunned by society, while drinking alcohol, which is by far more deadly to innocent bystanders, is accepted by society and virtually unregulated?
Far better that it is done voluntarily, and left in the capable hands of consumers and proprietors to choose. They would therefore smoke less at home, as well as less at work. Ian Rotea, United Kingdom How can you compare smoking to drinking?
These results suggest either, that the consumption in bars and restaurants is not affected by smoking bans in the long run, or, that negative revenue impacts by smokers are compensated by increasing revenues through non-smokers.
There should be rules restricting people who have little regard for the well-being of others. Therefore smoking should be banned in public places but more smoking areas should be built as well. Many people who drink also tend to smoke; banning drinkers from smoking has hurt business in some bars and restaurants.
Non-smokers who come across smokers "Lighting up a ciggy" suffer as badly as the smokers do. Rory Harden, UK The introduction of non-smoking cinemas, enabled me to visit them again. Smokers here seem to think they are being persecuted; well in that case my family has been for most of their young lives through no fault of their own.
What about the staff? If smoking was a less social activity, fewer people would start smoking.
Gavin, Wales I am convinced that many other enterprises would follow the example Ko Wei-Li, Taiwn Due to the ban against smoking in all its restaurants, Pizza Hut may lose a handful of customers.
Should smoking be banned in all restaurants? All of the older kids smoke so the youger kids like to be influenced by the Juniors and Seniors. Submit Yes, smoking should be banned. The larger the area, the larger the vent, the larger the vent the more powerful it needs to be, the more powerful it needs to be the louder it is.
A ban on smoking in public places would drive many bars, pubs and clubs out of business. The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that living with a smoker increases your chance of lung cancer by 19 percent. People who work in smoky workplaces e.
A ban on smoking in public would force them to smoke less while at work.
Some people are quite happy to work in smoky places. For example, many countries around the world, especially tropical nations, like Cuba as well as England consider cigarette as an important product to export to many other countries to get money or exchange other commodities.
Smoking also causes pollution and people who smoke leave their cigarettes everywhere they can on the ground, in the grass, on the plants. Some smokers have commented that business incomes will go down; I would hazard a guess profit should increase because people like myself would be able to go back and in addition the proprietors would be able to save additional money on cleaning, refurbishment, insurance, damage etc.
But public health is a government responsibility - one which is currently being evaded. A complete ban on smoking in public is needed to protect people from passive smoking.
The streets will be much cleaner if smoking is banned. Pete, UK I would actively boycott any restaurant that introduced such a ban Cameron, UK As a smoker who enjoys a cigarette, especially while dining, I would actively boycott any restaurant that introduced such a ban.
Jennifer, Netherlands, ex UK I think smoking should be banned in public. Even the so-called segregated restaurants cannot stop the drift of obnoxious smoke.
Play media and ABC news reports on the initial, and then the complete, indoor smoking bans in Victoria, Australia. Not many smokers throw away their cigarette butts into the trash cans.
If smokers cannot last the time to eat a meal without smoking, then they have a serious problem - I presume these are the same people that will travel for hours on a non-smoking plane to go on holiday!
Another reason why smoking should be banned in public places is because of the garbage problem. Just think what the health service would save without this self-inflicted burden on society.Smoking should be banned! Smoking is very harmful to others and an average ofpeople die of it a year. 50, people die from exposure to second hand smoke.
million people are ill because of smoking or the smoke. Smoking was banned in all public places in the whole of the United Kingdom inwhen England became the final region to have the legislation come into effect (the age limit for buying tobacco was also raised from 16 to 18 on 1 October ).
InNew York City amended its smoke-free law to include virtually all restaurants and bars. Pizza Hut is the UK's first nationwide restaurant chain to ban smoking in all its UK restaurants to protect staff and customers from passive smoking.
"Pizza Hut strongly believes that families should be able to take time to have a leisurely meal in a restaurant without exposing their children to. I believe smoking has already been banned in all indoor spaces (including those outside areas of restaurants and whatnot), except one’s own home or those smoking rooms they have at some places.
However i think while it’s a good idea and i agree on that not everyone should inhale any smoke if they don’t wish to, this system has it’s. Free Essay: Smoking Should Not Be Banned in Restaurants In the perfect situation, smoking policy would be set by bar or restaurant owners, and customers.
Yes. The main concern behind the call for a smoking ban in restaurants and bars is the health of the staff. They are the most vulnerable victims of passive smoking.
In fact, they are exposed to.Download